Monthly report · October 2026

Coding interview prep, October 2026: 1 open gap across 7 read companies.

As the catalog read it in October 2026 · written Nov 1, 2026. This report does not change after it is written. September 2026 →

Download the data (JSON)CSV

Forge’s own counts and the quoted claims with their sources are CC BY 4.0 — cite as Ambera Forge, Coding interview prep, October 2026. Carried market-size figures are their publishers’ and are not in the file.

What was read

7 companies placed; 7 read during October 2026.

Gaps closed and opened

5 themes were raised about two or more of 7 read companies; 1 shares no word with anything a company declares. The previous month was withheld, so there is nothing to compare against.

  • ● Price levelraised about 6 of 7
  • ● Usage limits and capsraised about 3 of 7
  • ● Free tier, trial and paywalled featuresraised about 3 of 7
  • ◌ Accuracy and output qualityraised about 2 of 7 · no declared match
  • ◌ Billing, fees and cancellationraised about 2 of 7 · no declared match

Who entered

0 companies placed; 3 products sighted by a search and not yet read (Aced (formerly Exponent/Pramp), DevInterview.AI, Intervu.dev).

  • Aced (formerly Exponent/Pramp) — sighted Oct 5, 2026 · source
  • DevInterview.AI — sighted Oct 5, 2026 · source
  • Intervu.dev — sighted Oct 5, 2026 · source

Pricing moves

5 of 7 read companies have a pricing entry on record; 8 pricing changes recorded across 5 companies this month.

  • LeetCode [COMPANY CLAIM] Oct 5, 2026 · 2 changes this monthLeetCode Premium is priced at $35/month or $159/year, with a free tier offering most of the 3,000+ problem bank, contests, and the Discuss community. source
  • Engineers between jobs [FACT] Oct 5, 2026 · 1 change this monthInterviewing.io's published pricing (as of Jan 2026) runs $150-225 per single session depending on interviewer level, with system design sessions costing more, plus multi-session packages. source
  • NeetCode [FACT] Oct 1, 2026 · 2 changes this monthNeetCode Pro is currently offered in two tiers on the vendor's own pricing page: Lifetime at $297 (struck-through list price $599), and One-Year Access at $119 (struck-through list price $199) with auto-renew off by default and future content included in both. source
  • AlgoExpert [FACT] Oct 1, 2026 · 2 changes this monthAs of 20 August 2026, AlgoExpert's public purchase page offers only one SKU — 'All Access' at $119 for one year, bundling AlgoExpert, SystemsExpert, FrontendExpert, MLExpert, InfraExpert, iOSExpert and BlockchainExpert — against a displayed list price of $693, with no standalone single-product tier visible on the page. source
  • HackerRank [COMPANY CLAIM] Oct 1, 2026 · 1 change this monthHackerRank publishes three tiers verified against its own pricing page: Starter $165/mo ($1,990/yr, 1 user, 2,000+ questions, 120 attempts/year), Pro $375/mo ($4,490/yr, unlimited users, 4,000+ questions, 300 attempts/year), and custom Enterprise with the full 7,500+ question library and 40+ integrations. source

What users raised

23 themes raised by users; the most raised: Price level (6 of 7), Free tier, trial and paywalled features (3 of 7), Usage limits and caps (3 of 7).

  • Price level 6/7
  • Free tier, trial and paywalled features 3/7
  • Usage limits and caps 3/7
  • Accuracy and output quality 2/7
  • Billing, fees and cancellation 2/7
  • Complexity, setup and learning curve 1/7
  • Content and catalog depth 1/7
  • difficulty sustaining practice while working full-time 1/7
  • fairness/double-standard when recruiters themselves use AI 1/7
  • feature deprecation (Engage candidate sourcing) 1/7
  • lack of company-specific insider feedback 1/7
  • LeetCode grind burnout 1/7
  • limited to technical interviews only 1/7
  • measuring progress by streaks/problem count rather than skill 1/7
  • no AI tools 1/7
  • No mock interview / code-pairing tool 1/7
  • promotional/astroturfed recommendations on forums 1/7
  • scheduling/waitlist friction 1/7
  • small problem set vs LeetCode 1/7
  • Thin coverage of niche advanced topics 1/7
  • uncertain ROI of paid platforms 1/7
  • unpaid take-home assessments feel exploitative 1/7
  • videos only in Python 1/7

Funding by quarter

Withheld: something was read in 1 of the last 8 quarters. A series needs at least 2 to say anything a single reading does not.

The ledger this month

28 observed claims recorded this month, 3 inferences counted apart, 2 sources that did not answer.

  • PRODUCT · 9
  • PRICING · 8
  • DISCOURSE · 7
  • COMPLAINT · 4

How big this market is, as its publishers state it

No market-size figure has been recorded for this level yet. Not read is not zero.

Research-house estimates for this sector, carried side by side under each house’s own name. Estimates of one market can differ several-fold; none is averaged, and none is Forge’s.

No publisher is named for this level yet, so there is nothing to read from. Publishers are authored in the taxonomy and arrive with a deploy.

Get this report monthly

Follow Coding interview prep, and read your product against it

Sign in and follow Coding interview prep: the next report arrives by mail on the first Monday of the month — weekly on a paid plan — and your own product is read against this sector every week. Free to start, no card, nothing metered.