Review economics
CherryHQ/cherry-studio
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests · · read 2 times
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 3.9× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥15%
Attributed
a floor
6
Attributed PRs
94
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#17798 fix(knowledge): prevent crash when refreshing knowledge item
2 reviews · 8h to merge
#17783 fix(chat-scroll): unify streaming follow state
2 reviews · 18h to merge
#17711 fix(server-tools): repair dead declarations and move model facts to registry data
0 reviews · 2.6d to merge
#17012 feat(message-anchor): refine anchor navigation into a minimal tick rail
1 round · 19 reviews · 19.6d to merge
#17707 test(job,stream-manager): remove wall-clock races from cancel and idle-timeout tests
2 reviews · 1h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#17737 fix(agent-session): align auto-compaction with model context window
1 round · 5 reviews · 2.5d to merge
#17825 fix(cherry-assistant): provide navigation entries proactively
2 reviews · 4h to merge
#17827 feat(user-avatar): replace built-in default avatar
2 reviews · 3h to merge
#17823 refactor(cherry-assistant): reduce cross-module coupling
5 reviews · 4h to merge
#17395 fix(selection-assistant): constrain opacity slider height
1 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
15% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 7 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 4469 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read CherryHQ/cherry-studio weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on CherryHQ/cherry-studio — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository