Review economics
ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#2129 fix: close #2122 explicit-suffix reject review blockers (OR-COR-607f1395 / OR-COR-26596201 / OR-COR-d6afd0d6)
15 reviews · 5.5d to merge
#2148 fix: 修复 Lark Stream Bot 域名路由
2 reviews · 28h to merge
#2156 docs: add macOS Gatekeeper troubleshooting
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#2151 fix: 修复按需分享图的原生分享退化
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#2150 fix: 按需生成分享图并恢复基础设置中的选股开关
1 reviews · 1h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 24 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 655 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository