Review economics
ChatGPTNextWeb/NextChat
Read from the 99 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.0× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥19%
Attributed
a floor
35
Attributed PRs
64
Other PRs
99
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#6849 test: add unit tests for ProsodyOptions (edge-tts)
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#6848 test: add unit tests for ChatCommandPrefix
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#6846 test: add unit tests for TTSConfigValidator
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#6845 test: add unit tests for ModalConfigValidator
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#6844 test: add unit tests for limitNumber
0 reviews · 0h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#6514 Add gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05 into constant.ts
2 reviews · 2.7d to merge
#45 v1.3 Stop and Retry Button
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#29 v1.2 bug fix and access control by code
0 reviews · 17h to merge
#6637 feat: new models for xAI (#6559)
0 reviews · 9.5d to merge
#6572 feat: Update moonshot models and fix for typo
2 reviews · 4.3d to merge
How this was measured
19% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 99 of 928 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read ChatGPTNextWeb/NextChat weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on ChatGPTNextWeb/NextChat — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository