Review economics
AykutSarac/jsoncrack.com
Read from the 91 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
91
Other PRs
91
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#595 feat: support shift wheel horizontal pan
2 reviews · 4.0d to merge
#578 Correct title of Theme Toggle toolbar button
1 reviews · 4.9d to merge
#573 feat: migrate to turborepo and separate canvas as package
0 reviews · 5.1d to merge
#569 Fix text editor options for paste json schema
0 reviews · 5.3d to merge
#572 chore: Update outdated GitHub Actions versions
0 reviews · 29h to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read AykutSarac/jsoncrack.com weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on AykutSarac/jsoncrack.com — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository