Review economics
vinta/awesome-python
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.4× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥42%
Attributed
a floor
11
Attributed PRs
89
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#3107 chore: refine UI, add JSON-LD, polish category SEO
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#3106 Static category pages and path-based filter URLs
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#3089 Add OpenAI's framework for building AI agents
2 reviews · 5h to merge
#3080 docs(ai-agents): add ag2 to AI Agents Orchestration
1 reviews · 15h to merge
#3076 chore: simplify website/ Python and polish sponsors section
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
42% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 4 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 738 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read vinta/awesome-python weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on vinta/awesome-python — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository