Review economics
yizhiyanhua-ai/fireworks-tech-graph
Read from the 20 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥9%
Attributed
a floor
2
Attributed PRs
18
Other PRs
20
Read
Attributed — the latest 2
The rest — the latest 5
#31 fix: preserve SVG subpaths and skew transforms
0 reviews · 3h to merge
#30 feat: support Codex and Claude Code
0 reviews · 8h to merge
#29 docs: recommend git clone over npx skills add to avoid missing subdirectories
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#26 feat: add Style 8 Dark Luxury (AI-authored)
0 reviews · 20h to merge
#24 fix: harden helper scripts and clean up corrupted reference docs
0 reviews · 12h to merge
How this was measured
9% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 3 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read yizhiyanhua-ai/fireworks-tech-graph weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on yizhiyanhua-ai/fireworks-tech-graph — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository