Review economics
nuxt/nuxt
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
99
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#35981 feat(nuxt): use @nuxt/cli v4 prerelease
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#35965 chore(deps): update vite and rolldown (4.x)
2 reviews · 4h to merge
#35970 chore(deps): update devdependency html-validate to v11.6.1 (3.x)
1 reviews · 1h to merge
#35971 chore(deps): update nitro (3.x)
1 reviews · 1h to merge
#35969 chore(deps): update codspeedhq/action action to v5 (3.x)
1 reviews · 1h to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 8236 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent, OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read nuxt/nuxt weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on nuxt/nuxt — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository