Review economics
usebruno/bruno
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#8735 fix:change-version modal ui
5 reviews · 13.0d to merge
#8833 fix:keep sort column header from shifting when the arrow appears
3 reviews · 4.4d to merge
#8862 fix(mount): hydrate websocket message uids in the cached mount path
1 reviews · 17h to merge
#8871 feat: add sorting to the secrets tab as well
4 reviews · 1h to merge
#8575 fix(scripting): preserve variables set in req.onFail
7 reviews · 15.1d to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 2605 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read usebruno/bruno weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on usebruno/bruno — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository