Review economics
xpzouying/xiaohongshu-mcp
Read from the 99 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.6× the time to merge of the rest.
≥57%
Attributed
a floor
63
Attributed PRs
36
Other PRs
99
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#795 chore: 移除从未赋值的 post_id 字段，并修正 API 文档
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#794 fix(docker): tini 注册为 child subreaper，消除误导性告警
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#793 fix(docker): 镜像内置 tini 作为 PID 1，回收浏览器子进程
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#792 fix(publish): 正文输入框改为轮询定位，不再 panic
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#791 fix(cookies): 保存时创建缺失的父目录
0 reviews · 0h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
How this was measured
57% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 99 of 246 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read xpzouying/xiaohongshu-mcp weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on xpzouying/xiaohongshu-mcp — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository