Review economics
Leonxlnx/taste-skill
Read from the 8 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.6× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥38%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
5
Other PRs
8
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#82 Remove broken star history chart
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#81 Update sponsor listings
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#37 fix: LAYOUT_VARIANCE -> DESIGN_VARIANCE in v1 anti-center bias rule
0 reviews · 15.0d to merge
#49 Add Star History section to README
0 reviews · 2.1d to merge
#51 fix(stitch-skill): correct dead Google Stitch prerequisite link
1 reviews · 3h to merge
How this was measured
38% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Devin, Claude Code, Cursor agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read Leonxlnx/taste-skill weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on Leonxlnx/taste-skill — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository