Review economics
xcanwin/KeepChatGPT
Read from the 35 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
35
Other PRs
35
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#536 修复大屏模式下输入框未居中
0 reviews · 9.2d to merge
#525 fix(sidebar): remove hidden tiny rail gap
0 reviews · 2.1d to merge
#527 修复侧边栏 tiny bar 吸附异常
0 reviews · 34h to merge
#521 fix: return valid Response objects from fetch hooks to avoid Statsig runtime errors
1 reviews · 18.7d to merge
#511 修复展示大屏
1 reviews · 2.6d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read xcanwin/KeepChatGPT weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on xcanwin/KeepChatGPT — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository