Review economics
musistudio/claude-code-router
Read from the 68 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥2%
Attributed
a floor
2
Attributed PRs
66
Other PRs
68
Read
Attributed — the latest 2
The rest — the latest 5
#1618 fix(ui): repair provider setup flow in Get Started onboarding
0 reviews · 2.2d to merge
#1622 fix(codex): 同步本地登录的最新 OAuth 凭据
0 reviews · 24h to merge
#1626 fix(gateway): compare API keys in constant time
0 reviews · 11h to merge
#1623 fix(ui): 修复窄窗口下侧栏和账户卡片内容被遮挡的问题
0 reviews · 4h to merge
#1621 fix: show routed model in request logs
0 reviews · 25h to merge
How this was measured
2% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 2 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read musistudio/claude-code-router weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on musistudio/claude-code-router — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository