Review economics
anthropics/skills
Read from the 45 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.4× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥92%
Attributed
a floor
41
Attributed PRs
4
Other PRs
45
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#1476 Update claude-api skill: Claude Opus 5
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#1463 Update claude-api skill: Managed Agents July launch wave, partner pricing, tool-runner corrections
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#1447 Update docx, pptx, and xlsx skills
1 reviews · 8h to merge
#1373 Update claude-api skill: Claude Sonnet 5 and Managed Agents July updates
1 reviews · 22h to merge
#1363 Update claude-api skill: per-SDK doc split, code_execution_20260521, platform-availability
1 reviews · 12h to merge
The rest — the latest 4
How this was measured
92% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read anthropics/skills weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on anthropics/skills — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository