Review economics
bilibili/flv.js
Read from the 20 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
20
Other PRs
20
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#448 添加AbortController来终止fetch，修复播放器在destroy后仍然会下载数据的问题
1 reviews · 704.3d to merge
#671 feat: skip tag which has error timestamp
0 reviews · 4h to merge
#292 fixed: 报错信息英语语法错误😏
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#354 use a new silent frame insert algorithm for audio remux
0 reviews · 1006.5d to merge
#535 修复在请求进入_pump前调用abort，请求没中断的问题
0 reviews · 474.2d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read bilibili/flv.js weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on bilibili/flv.js — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository