Review economics
opencv/opencv
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.7× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥7%
Attributed
a floor
4
Attributed PRs
96
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 4
#29632 core: restore in-place support for extractChannel (#29568)
1 reviews · 13h to merge
#29548 dnn: map FP16 input types to FP32 in getFLOPS for the new graph engine
2 reviews · 6.4d to merge
#29300 Added harfbuzz; use it instead of STB to render text
2 reviews · 2.5d to merge
#29426 Broadcasting element-wise engine for cv::Mat (+ cv::texpr)
2 reviews · 14.9d to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#29657 Add dnn conformance python tests
1 reviews · 27h to merge
#29609 geometry: Vectorize fisheye::undistortPoints
2 reviews · 9.2d to merge
#29625 RVV HAL kernels for DNN max/average pooling
3 reviews · 7.2d to merge
#29653 features: fix MSER discarding stable regions via minDiversity (#29652)
1 reviews · 20h to merge
#29643 fix apng background dispose overrun in png readData
1 reviews · 3.3d to merge
How this was measured
7% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 14010 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read opencv/opencv weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on opencv/opencv — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository