Review economics
vrana/adminer
Read from the 93 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
93
Other PRs
93
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#1314 ClickHouse: Complete driver support
0 reviews · 34h to merge
#1309 before-unload: the page is being left, not reloaded (cs, de)
0 reviews · 7h to merge
#1310 PHPStan: Drop the booleanAnd.alwaysFalse ignore, unused since 2.2.6
0 reviews · 7h to merge
#1199 Connecting to socket did not work after support for ipv6 in 5.4.0
0 reviews · 262.2d to merge
#1261 Fix blob editing
0 reviews · 102.0d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read vrana/adminer weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on vrana/adminer — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository