Review economics
video-dev/hls.js
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥5%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#7965 Prevent loop loading for SourceBuffer mismatch append errors
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#7963 Fix key-status internal-error handling
0 reviews · 31h to merge
#7956 perf(fmp4): box parsing
2 reviews · 5.6d to merge
#7926 Defer playlist reload while network is offline
2 reviews · 29.4d to merge
#7752 fix: correct computeInitPts rollover condition causing segment 0 loop
3 reviews · 48h to merge
How this was measured
5% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 3954 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read video-dev/hls.js weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on video-dev/hls.js — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository