Review economics
xinntao/Real-ESRGAN
Read from the 21 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
21
Other PRs
21
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#139 Add Training.md Simplified Chinese Version
0 reviews · 176.6d to merge
#423 Added Upscayl under GUI Apps list
0 reviews · 24.1d to merge
#428 Add Replicate demo
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#338 Re-organize README
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#321 Added GPU selection feature to python inference
0 reviews · 17.7d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read xinntao/Real-ESRGAN weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on xinntao/Real-ESRGAN — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository