Review economics
homebridge/homebridge
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.9× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥17%
Attributed
a floor
15
Attributed PRs
85
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
The rest — the latest 5
#3978 Update engines for NodeJS 26, and HAP-NodeJS Beta with updated engine…
4 reviews · 22h to merge
#3816 v2.0.0-beta
8 reviews · 330.0d to merge
#3976 feat(matter): populate bridged accessory firmware version from firmwareRevision
1 reviews · 2h to merge
#3977 fix(matter): declare ac/dc feature on power measurement
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#3969 fix(matter): restore cached accessories into the bridge before going online
1 reviews · 1h to merge
How this was measured
17% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 369 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read homebridge/homebridge weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on homebridge/homebridge — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository