Review economics
umijs/qiankun
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.1× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥7%
Attributed
a floor
7
Attributed PRs
93
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#3141 ci: deploy docs to Cloudflare Pages; disable Vercel git deploys
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#3140 docs: refresh AGENTS.md with v3 ESM-sandbox architecture + add CLAUDE.md
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#3133 feat: support ESM sandbox
0 reviews · 11.9d to merge
#3135 feat: playwright e2e infrastructure + sandbox/loader fixes it surfaced
0 reviews · 3h to merge
#3138 feat: modernize examples on current tech stacks (+4 sandbox/loading fixes it surfaced)
0 reviews · 5h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#3171 feat(examples): add a streamed-entry micro app showcasing progressive rendering
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#3169 feat(qiankun): container occupancy gate + sandbox pipeline-mark internalization
0 reviews · 7.1d to merge
#3170 feat: vendor single-spa 7.0 as @qiankunjs/single-spa (RFC #3168)
0 reviews · 8h to merge
#3167 feat(examples): deploy the examples to examples.qiankunjs.com
0 reviews · 17h to merge
#3166 fix(ui-bindings): repair both bindings by dogfooding them in the examples
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
7% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 5 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 741 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read umijs/qiankun weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on umijs/qiankun — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository