Review economics
umano/AndroidSlidingUpPanel
Read from the 81 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
81
Other PRs
81
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#692 Fix NPE in drawChild() when returning to Fragment with animation. App…
0 reviews · 176.7d to merge
#838 Fix potential NPEs and synchronization errors.
1 reviews · 21h to merge
#416 add ability to use variable panel heights in collapsed mode
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#837 Update build.gradle
4 reviews · 92.6d to merge
#830 Fixed Bug: SlidingUpPanelLayout ignores setPanelState()
0 reviews · 131.3d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read umano/AndroidSlidingUpPanel weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on umano/AndroidSlidingUpPanel — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository