Review economics
u14app/deep-research
Read from the 12 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥3%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
11
Other PRs
12
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#164 feat: add fastCRW (Firecrawl-compatible) search provider
0 reviews · 38h to merge
#20 Add Server-Side Data Storage and Cross-Device Synchronization
0 reviews · 10.4d to merge
#162 ci: add GitHub Actions workflow for linting on PRs and manual trigger
0 reviews · 3.9d to merge
#161 fix: handle empty request body for searxng
0 reviews · 4.0d to merge
#151 Dev jdb
1 reviews · 5h to merge
How this was measured
3% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read u14app/deep-research weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on u14app/deep-research — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository