Review economics
tw93/MiaoYan
Read from the 27 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥11%
Attributed
a floor
2
Attributed PRs
25
Other PRs
27
Read
Attributed — the latest 2
The rest — the latest 5
#523 [codex] Normalize attachment filenames
0 reviews · 22h to merge
#520 fix: keep currently open note visible in list after Finder open
0 reviews · 3.1d to merge
#511 Supports symbolic link directories
0 reviews · 47h to merge
#508 fix: hide TOC panel during PDF export
0 reviews · 10h to merge
#500 es locale update
0 reviews · 3.2d to merge
How this was measured
11% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 5 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher.
Detected: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read tw93/MiaoYan weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on tw93/MiaoYan — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository