Review economics
trufflesecurity/trufflehog
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.1× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
97
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#5162 surface git clone errors at v(0)
1 reviews · 8.0d to merge
#4902 [INS-456] Add Microsoft Teams Webhook V2 detector
8 reviews · 106.4d to merge
#5178 make cwd-changing normalization tests non-parallel to fix flaky clone failures
1 reviews · 19h to merge
#5177 [SCAN-1018] Treat SlackWebhook invalid_token (HTTP 400) as determinate not-live
1 reviews · 22h to merge
#5165 feat(output): add SARIF output format for GitHub code scanning
1 round · 8 reviews · 6.0d to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 3252 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Cursor agent, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read trufflesecurity/trufflehog weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on trufflesecurity/trufflehog — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository