Review economics
transcranial/keras-js
Read from the 12 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
12
Other PRs
12
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#84 Update Bidirectional for mergeMode 'sum', 'mul', 'ave' with returnSequences = True
0 reviews · 36.2d to merge
#85 Add CDNJS version badge in README.md
0 reviews · 34.3d to merge
#64 Clean up javascript promise code
0 reviews · 21.5d to merge
#55 Changing main to point to built files in dist/keras.js
0 reviews · 11.0d to merge
#56 Adding instructions to readme about cloning this large repo
0 reviews · 10.9d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 12 of 13 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read transcranial/keras-js weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on transcranial/keras-js — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository