Review economics
transact-rs/sqlx
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#4286 Fix query macros against CockroachDB by gating plan_cache_mode on EXPLAIN support
0 reviews · 35.0d to merge
#4278 docs: document sqlx test connection limits
0 reviews · 38.9d to merge
#4317 fix(sqlite): migrate datetime format builders off time 0.3.48-depreca…
0 reviews · 10.6d to merge
#3723 Add SqlStr
1 round · 10 reviews · 155.5d to merge
#4306 fix(sqlite): return 0 for changes if statement is read-only
0 reviews · 1h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 1088 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read transact-rs/sqlx weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on transact-rs/sqlx — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository