Review economics
tokio-rs/axum
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.2× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥3%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
97
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
#3769 docs(cookie): clarify cookie-key-expansion for Key::derive_from (fixes #2646)
1 reviews · 2h to merge
#3771 docs(routing): document path must start with in route()
1 reviews · 1h to merge
#3762 examples: fix `using_serve_dir_with_assets_fallback` to not expose assets at root
1 round · 4 reviews · 2h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#3858 Fix nested error downcast
2 reviews · 24h to merge
#3840 chore(deps): bump release-plz/action from 0.5.130 to 0.5.131
1 reviews · 14.6d to merge
#3851 axum: use `futures_util::future::select` instead of `tokio::select!` in serve
1 reviews · 5.1d to merge
#3857 chore(deps): bump taiki-e/cache-cargo-install-action from 3 to 3.0.7
1 reviews · 6h to merge
#3838 Add docs describing how, why and when to use &'static state
4 reviews · 14.2d to merge
How this was measured
3% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 1663 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Cursor agent, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read tokio-rs/axum weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on tokio-rs/axum — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository