Review economics
tirth8205/code-review-graph
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.3× the commits after first review of the rest.
≥12%
Attributed
a floor
19
Attributed PRs
81
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#806 test(daemon): fix Windows PID-reuse flake in test_is_daemon_running_dead
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#805 fix(windows): POSIX-stable qualified names and file paths (#774)
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#801 fix(visualize): vendor pinned D3 so --serve works offline (#475)
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#800 fix(parser): resolve C# receiver calls to canonical method nodes (#612)
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#799 fix(graph): expand C# namespace imports in impact and test resolution (#310, #792)
0 reviews · 0h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#783 Add Voyage embedding provider
0 reviews · 25h to merge
#794 [Bug]: C# method names extracted as the return type: async Task Foo() indexes as Task, merging disti
0 reviews · 4h to merge
#723 Update README.md
1 round · 2 reviews · 7.5d to merge
#789 deps: update mypy requirement from <2,>=1.10 to >=1.10,<3
0 reviews · 10h to merge
#788 deps: update mcp requirement from <2,>=1.0.0 to >=1.0.0,<3
0 reviews · 10h to merge
How this was measured
12% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 37 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 254 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, Cursor agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read tirth8205/code-review-graph weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on tirth8205/code-review-graph — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository