Review economics
tindy2013/subconverter
Read from the 85 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
85
Other PRs
85
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#876 Correctly format Hysteria2 server_ports for sing-box
0 reviews · 101.6d to merge
#872 Delete include/quickjspp.hpp
0 reviews · 2.4d to merge
#871 feat: proxyToLoon supports Hysteria2
0 reviews · 3.7d to merge
#844 Modify rules order so that dns can be routed normally in Global mode for Sing-box.
0 reviews · 6h to merge
#820 Enhanced Profile Configuration Parsing and Tag Matching in profile.ini
0 reviews · 108.7d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read tindy2013/subconverter weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on tindy2013/subconverter — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository