Review economics
timschneeb/awesome-shizuku
Read from the 56 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
55
Other PRs
56
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#144 Added the `DNS Toggle` application to the list
0 reviews · 6h to merge
#141 replace digipaws with curbox
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#139 Add Mythara to AI agents — local-first agentic AI OS layer for Android
0 reviews · 20.0d to merge
#137 Add Blink to Productivity
1 reviews · 2.9d to merge
#138 Add ShizuCallRecorder to the project list
0 reviews · 12h to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read timschneeb/awesome-shizuku weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on timschneeb/awesome-shizuku — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository