Review economics
ItzCrazyKns/Vane
Read from the 87 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
86
Other PRs
87
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#1097 fix: add missing break statements in weather code switch
2 reviews · 23h to merge
#1082 fix: prevent stuck spinner on failed file uploads
1 reviews · 17h to merge
#1076 fix: guard against non-array searching queries in research steps
1 reviews · 3.9d to merge
#1015 feat: improve search resilience with timeouts and widget error handling
2 reviews · 6.0d to merge
#1041 fix: add typing_extensions to Dockerfile to resolve build error
2 reviews · 15h to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Devin.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read ItzCrazyKns/Vane weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on ItzCrazyKns/Vane — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository