Review economics
karpathy/nanochat
Read from the 84 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
83
Other PRs
84
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#533 Improve error handling for batch size alignment
1 reviews · 138.0d to merge
#568 Remove inherited parameters from scripts
0 reviews · 126.8d to merge
#540 Use HF's community kernel for FA3 for Ada and Ampere
5 reviews · 135.1d to merge
#683 Small doc fixes for consistency
1 reviews · 94.4d to merge
#311 Validate checkpoint file format in find_last_step
5 reviews · 225.6d to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read karpathy/nanochat weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on karpathy/nanochat — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository