Review economics
doocs/advanced-java
Read from the 94 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.2× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥2%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
91
Other PRs
94
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#339 docs: mark RabbitMQ mirror cluster mode as deprecated since 4.0 (fix #329)
1 reviews · 15.0d to merge
#332 docs(high-concurrency): 添加 Quorum Queues 作为 RabbitMQ 高可用推荐方案
1 reviews · 9.9d to merge
#331 chore: Update outdated GitHub Actions versions
1 reviews · 38h to merge
#310 docs: add a missing link to README.md
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#322 chore: update workflow
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
2% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Cursor agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read doocs/advanced-java weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on doocs/advanced-java — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository