Review economics
strvcom/code-quality-tools
Read from the 58 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
58
Other PRs
58
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#274 feat(eslint-config-react-native): enforce minimum id length
0 reviews · 20.1d to merge
#273 feat(eslint-config-react-native): allow throw promise
1 reviews · 21h to merge
#272 feat: add react native eslint config
7 reviews · 14.1d to merge
#271 feat: upgrade to ESLint v9 & all related dependencies 🔥
0 reviews · 7.0d to merge
#250 feat: move to ESLint v9 👏
2 reviews · 118.8d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read strvcom/code-quality-tools weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on strvcom/code-quality-tools — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository