Review economics
spring-projects/spring-ai
Read from the 99 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
99
Other PRs
99
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#6704 Fix inaccurate Content interface Javadoc
0 reviews · 7.9d to merge
#6732 Refine documentation about MCP transport security
0 reviews · 17h to merge
#6703 Preserve AssistantMessage subclass fields on copy
1 round · 2 reviews · 6.3d to merge
#6731 Add instructions option to OpenAiAudioSpeechModel
1 reviews · 1h to merge
#6680 Reject lossy `int` and `long` conversions in `@McpPrompt`
0 reviews · 3.5d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 2 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 99 of 1034 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read spring-projects/spring-ai weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on spring-projects/spring-ai — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository