Review economics
soybeanjs/soybean-admin
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#933 feat(layout): support mouse wheel horizontal scroll on global tab
1 round · 2 reviews · 3.3d to merge
#930 支持通过路由 meta.isDev 实现仅开发环境加载的路由
0 reviews · 10h to merge
#927 fix(packages): mobile sider stuck at w-0 in production
1 reviews · 2.2d to merge
#773 optimize(projects): improve theme drawer responsive width for mobile devices
1 reviews · 14h to merge
#882 feat(components): Add “Select All” to TableColumnSetting
1 reviews · 1h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 256 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read soybeanjs/soybean-admin weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on soybeanjs/soybean-admin — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository