Review economics
shmilylty/OneForAll
Read from the 47 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
47
Other PRs
47
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#411 exporting utf-8 csv files
0 reviews · 192.3d to merge
#410 add windvane api
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#396 增加空间测绘引擎最大查询数量限制，允许用户不使用 tldextract 提取主域名，升级exrex版本，修复`No module named 'distutils.util'`的bug
0 reviews · 43.5d to merge
#337 修改censys api地址以及对应的调用逻辑
0 reviews · 386.9d to merge
#367 Update mx.py
0 reviews · 73.8d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read shmilylty/OneForAll weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on shmilylty/OneForAll — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository