Review economics
shadowsocks/ShadowsocksX-NG
Read from the 64 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
64
Other PRs
64
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#1501 Feat(QRCode): Enhance 'Scan QR Code From Screen' notifications # #1250
4 reviews · 32h to merge
#1461 Delay write of plist file to fix frequent notification issue on Ventura
1 reviews · 2h to merge
#1456 Disable CODE_SIGNING_INJECT_BASE_ENTITLEMENTS for release build #1455
1 reviews · 6.8d to merge
#1437 Build universal binary from source
1 reviews · 4.8d to merge
#1306 Set jsDelivr to default GFWListURL instead of GitHub Raw
1 reviews · 422.4d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read shadowsocks/ShadowsocksX-NG weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on shadowsocks/ShadowsocksX-NG — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository