Review economics
sebastianbergmann/php-file-iterator
Read from the 95 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
95
Other PRs
95
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#151 Update dependency tomasvotruba/type-coverage to ^2.3.0 (6.0)
0 reviews · 9h to merge
#150 Update dependency phpunit/phpunit to ^12.5.33 (6.0)
0 reviews · 9h to merge
#149 Update dependency phpstan/phpstan to ^2.2.7 (6.0)
0 reviews · 6h to merge
#148 Update dependency tomasvotruba/type-coverage to ^2.3.0 (main)
0 reviews · 6h to merge
#147 Update dependency phpunit/phpunit to ^13.2.6 (main)
0 reviews · 2h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read sebastianbergmann/php-file-iterator weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on sebastianbergmann/php-file-iterator — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository