Review economics
scwang90/SmartRefreshLayout
Read from the 12 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
12
Other PRs
12
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#1485 Update dependencies & migrating to androidx
0 reviews · 157.0d to merge
#1499 时区修改后需要及时更新下拉刷新的时间否则出现下拉刷新的时间与系统时间不一致问题
0 reviews · 98.9d to merge
#1462 Update md_property.md
0 reviews · 318.3d to merge
#1446 优化在overSpin复位contentView到原始位置的过程中，再次按下手指下拉contentView会导致contentView向上…
0 reviews · 394.9d to merge
#1439 更新英文README：1.更新2.0.5以后增加依赖的写法 2.更新最新版本角标说明
0 reviews · 422.2d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read scwang90/SmartRefreshLayout weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on scwang90/SmartRefreshLayout — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository