Review economics
sabrogden/Ditto
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#1119 Add Brazilian Portuguese translation (pt-BR)
1 reviews · 2.3d to merge
#1107 Add shortcut action for starred clips
1 reviews · 15.5d to merge
#1110 Updated to the latest sqlitemc - Updated to the latest PlatformToolse…
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#1098 Add starred clips filter
1 reviews · 3.9d to merge
#1100 Add Go to Entry right-click action in search results
0 reviews · 2h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 2 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 125 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read sabrogden/Ditto weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on sabrogden/Ditto — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository