Review economics
nanocoai/nanoclaw
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.4× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥46%
Attributed
a floor
56
Attributed PRs
44
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#3187 fix(agent-runner): disallow built-in SendMessage so agent-to-agent messaging works
1 reviews · 5h to merge
#3182 versions: repin the agent image to hardened-2026-08-02
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#3160 versions: repin the agent image to hardened-2026-07-30
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#3159 container: make the Vercel CLI opt-in rather than baked into every image
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#3150 setup: fetch a hardened agent image instead of building it
0 reviews · 2h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#3154 fix(agent-runner): give scheduled tasks current run time
1 reviews · 4.7d to merge
#3180 fix(update): surface hardened image migration
1 reviews · 6h to merge
#3137 Fix engagement consistency and expose self-serve wiring controls
1 reviews · 8.2d to merge
#3181 fix(imessage): opt in via first message to the assigned line
1 reviews · 2h to merge
#3143 Preserve resolved approval card content
1 reviews · 6.7d to merge
How this was measured
46% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 2 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 480 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read nanocoai/nanoclaw weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on nanocoai/nanoclaw — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository