Review economics
3b1b/manim
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥6%
Attributed
a floor
2
Attributed PRs
98
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 2
The rest — the latest 5
#2481 Fix time based updaters
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#2480 Make formatting for copied frame orientation more universal
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#2479 Clarify how stroke width and anti-alias width convert to drawn coordi…
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#2472 fix(latex): convert tex file Path to POSIX format for Windows compatibility
0 reviews · 23.2d to merge
#2475 docs: clarify Manim project choice
0 reviews · 8.4d to merge
How this was measured
6% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 675 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read 3b1b/manim weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on 3b1b/manim — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository