Review economics
richards199999/Thinking-Claude
Read from the 24 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
24
Other PRs
24
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#75 fixing typo "prblem_solving_approach" to "problem_solving_approach"
0 reviews · 222.7d to merge
#80 [Typo] Be Aware of
0 reviews · 39.2d to merge
#83 Unified monolog spelling
0 reviews · 4.7d to merge
#60 feat: enhance model instructions - 1. add: require Claude to respond …
0 reviews · 68.9d to merge
#64 build(chrome): Add extension version sync check between package.json and manifest.json in case forgetting to update version accidentally in pre-commit
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read richards199999/Thinking-Claude weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on richards199999/Thinking-Claude — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository