Review economics
qgis/QGIS
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#66707 Introduce new QgsVectorDataProvider::renderingSettings api
4 reviews · 30.2d to merge
#66958 Remove QgsProject::instance() references from QgsMapLayerLegend (QEP 423)
1 reviews · 39h to merge
#44982 [annotations] Add framework for map tools for creating new annotation items, implement for new point text tool
1 reviews · 3h to merge
#66935 Port 'Execute SQL' algorithm and widget wrapper to c++
2 reviews · 3.5d to merge
#66962 Processing relief creation options
1 reviews · 25h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 27556 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read qgis/QGIS weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on qgis/QGIS — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository