Review economics
nextcloud/server
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥3%
Attributed
a floor
2
Attributed PRs
98
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 2
The rest — the latest 5
#62879 fix(theming): Speed up slow animations
2 reviews · 8h to merge
#62702 [stable34] fix(MemcachedFactory): Enable TCP_NODELAY and adjust default timeouts to be reasonable
2 reviews · 5.2d to merge
#62605 feat(core): redesign unified search result presentation
2 rounds · 4 reviews · 7.3d to merge
#62852 Hide personal settings of apps not enabled for the user
2 reviews · 15h to merge
#62868 feat(api): Add getOrCreateFolder also for SimpleFS module
3 reviews · 8h to merge
How this was measured
3% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 33739 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read nextcloud/server weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on nextcloud/server — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository