Review economics
pydantic/monty
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 2.7× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥55%
Attributed
a floor
52
Attributed PRs
48
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#667 Memory limit followups
5 reviews · 0h to merge
#656 Re-validate cached overlay host paths on every read
8 reviews · 30h to merge
#655 Windows path-parsing mount escape
9 reviews · 29h to merge
#646 Apply memory limit via custom allocator
36 reviews · 6.2d to merge
#643 Make bytes substring search linear and interruptible
10 reviews · 5.4d to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#662 attempt to configure telemetry via bindings or monty-runtime logfire
13 reviews · 22h to merge
#567 implement `NotImplemented` and use it for user equality
1 round · 9 reviews · 18.9d to merge
#638 move `py_set_attr` onto `PyTrait`
3 reviews · 6.0d to merge
#652 make benchmarks async properly
4 reviews · 1h to merge
#651 Review Skills
6 reviews · 1h to merge
How this was measured
55% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 439 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read pydantic/monty weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on pydantic/monty — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository