Review economics
pwn20wndstuff/Undecimus
Read from the 22 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
22
Other PRs
22
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#1 merging master into ui-additions, then requesting to merge ui-additions into master
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#1076 Fixed bugs and fonts
0 reviews · 9h to merge
#1073 New UI Implemented
0 reviews · 12h to merge
#1064 Bug fixes in UI and removed some hated components.
0 reviews · 6h to merge
#1062 Fixes in new UI
0 reviews · 1h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read pwn20wndstuff/Undecimus weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on pwn20wndstuff/Undecimus — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository