Review economics
maboloshi/github-chinese
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
99
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#770 添加词条：杂项
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#725 test: fix issue 702 regression expectations
0 reviews · 29.4d to merge
#767 refactor: 移除根目录 main(vscode).user.js, 统一由扩展维护
0 reviews · 17h to merge
#764 🔧 chore(vscode-extension): 锁定 @vscode/vsce 3.9.2 确保可复现打包
0 reviews · 13h to merge
#763 fix: Preserve React search button behavior during translation
0 reviews · 19h to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 2 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 273 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read maboloshi/github-chinese weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on maboloshi/github-chinese — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository